I got a subscription to Poetry Magazine for my birthday, and up until this month, there has only been a few poems in each issue that really stood out to me, but the July/ August issue is full of great material. Besides the new poems by Billy Collins, Stephen Dunn and Stephen O’Conner, there is portfolio of Jack Spicer’s work and a radio play by Yehuda Amichai. Spicer has been an influence to me for the last couple of years, and this look at some of his work I had not seen before did not disappoint, though the fullness of the issue is what really got me thinking. From the earlier issues of the magazine I have collected, this ratio of about one good poem per issue seems to stand, including my favorite Ted Berrigan poem, which, because I am not sure it was printed anywhere else, and because it is about forty years old, I will reprint below. A subscription to the magazine costs thirty-five dollars a year, and if I was only really blown away by one poem an issue, then ostensibly, the cost is about 3 dollars per poem, which is a pretty reasonable price to pay for something beautiful, that might even change the way one thinks about poetics.
As a bonus in this issue, there is a crossword puzzle. I haven’t sat down and really tried to solve it, but after reading a handful of the clues, I do not think I would get very far, though I know that the beginning of the rhyme scheme of a limerick is “AA,” Anne Sexton is a famous confessional poet, and Hart Crane is the Bridge man. Even though some might think it a frivolity of the now better funded magazine, including the crossword seems like a pretty logical inclusion for the magazine, as it fits the crowd that reads the magazine. Crosswords are the purest forms of allusion, as there is no clue in them that is not a reference to some outside source. Allusion is a dying literary device. As peoples frames of reference become more and more diverse, it becomes harder to justify an allusion to something for the weight such a reference can add, if very few people will know the reference, and fewer will put together the present evocation with their prior experience. Granted, one can still use the pillars of western thought, the Bible and Greek and Roman mythology, but finding a unique spin on them after thousands of years becomes, in my mind, a rather boring pursuit (how many poems reference Orpheus? Probably as many as ones that reference that, indeed, a poem is being written). Also, to invoke obscure references is to create a purposeful line of pretension, which to a great extent (aside from the fascist beliefs, which most people serious about art could overlook) is why Pound is not read very much anymore. His sources are no longer in the common pool of knowledge, so neither is he. It is for this reason as well, Spicer’s earlier work, upon revisiting, stands out as his better work in my mind; it does not rely on knowing a specific political or social reference of the time to be enjoyable.
Allusion, then, is really a selfish form, in and of itself, of artistic venture. Which is not to say great works can not be based upon allusion, but they will be great not for the reference, but rather for what they are without the presupposed knowledge of the reference. Apparently I’ve been rethinking the way I should be writing this thing, as I pretty much have just dropped a bunch of names in some of the other entries and hoped people will pick up on them. I guess there’s a counter argument that works around the thesis that if one is unwilling to share something with others, that thing has no value, as its only existence is dependent upon the singular source. This line of reasoning, then, necessitates the existence of the blog, to create a greater value (haa haa haa, that’s extrapolating way too far, but yeah, If one has more money than one can reasonably spend on legitimate pursuits, then the only things of value that person has to give are knowledge and kindness.)
It seems this is my new dumping ground for all the ideas that I don’t want to turn into papers.
Anyway, pick up a copy of the July/ August issue of Poetry if you have 4 dollars and are into poetry, here’s the poem I promised way up there:
Words For Love (for Sandy)
Winter Crisp and the brittleness of snow
as like make me tired as not. I go my
myriad ways blundering, bombastic, dragged
by a self that can never be still, pushed
by my surging blood, my reasoning mind.
I am in love with poetry. Every way I turn
this, my weakness, smites me. A glass
of chocolate milk, head of lettuce, dark-
ness of clouds at one o’clock obsess me.
I weep for all of these or laugh.
By day I sleep, an obscurantist, lost
in dreams of lists compiled by my self
for reassurance. Jackson Pollock Rene
Rilke Benedict Arnold I watch
my psyche, smile, dream wet dreams and sigh.
At night, awake, high on poems or pills
or simple awe that loveliness exists, my lists
flow differently. Of words bright red
and black and blue. Boksy. Oubliette. Dis-
severed. And O, alas
Time disturbs me. Always minute detail
fills me up. It is 12:10 in New York. In Houston
it is 2 p. m. It is time to steal books! It’s
time to go mad. It is the day of the apocalypse
the year of parrot fever! What am I saying?
Only this. My poems do contain
wilde beestes. I write for my Lady
of the Lake. My god is immense, and lonely
but uncowed. I trust my sanity, and I am proud. If
I sometimes grow weary, and seem still, neverless
my heart still loves, will break.
Ted Berrigan. “Words for Love”. Poetry (1968) Vol. 112(3): 164-165
-Bryan
p.s. The title of this entry comes from Kelly Clarkson by way of Girl Talk (seriously, listen to Feed the Animals if you haven’t already)